June 25, 2003

Breaking Down the Bush Fear

AlterNet: A Nation of Victims byRenana Brooks, PhD

George W Bush is generally regarded as a mangler of the English language. What is overlooked is his mastery of emotional language especially negatively charged emotional language as a political tool.

To create a dependency dynamic between him and the electorate, Bush describes the nation as being in a perpetual state of crisis and then attempts to convince the electorate that it is powerless and that he is the only one with the strength to deal with it.

Bush is a master at inducing learned helplessness in the electorate. He uses pessimistic language that creates fear and disables people from feeling they can solve their problems.

All political leaders must define the present threats and problems faced by the country before describing their approach to a solution, but the ratio of negative to optimistic statements in Bush's speeches and policy declarations is much higher, more pervasive and more long-lasting than that of any other President. Let's compare "crisis" speeches by Bush and Ronald Reagan, the President with whom he most identifies himself. In Reagan's October 27, 1983, televised address to the nation on the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Beirut, he used nineteen images of crisis and twenty-one images of optimism, evenly balancing optimistic and negative depictions... George W Bush's October 7, 2002, major policy speech on Iraq, on the other hand, began with forty-four consecutive statements referring to the crisis and citing a multitude of possible catastrophic repercussions.

Bush's political opponents are caught in a fantasy that they can win against him simply by proving the superiority of their ideas. However, people do not support Bush for the power of his ideas, but out of the despair and desperation in their hearts. Whenever people are in the grip of a desperate dependency, they won't respond to rational criticisms of the people they are dependent on. They will respond to plausible and forceful statements and alternatives that put the American electorate back in touch with their core optimism. Bush's opponents must combat his dark imagery with hope and restore American vigor and optimism in the coming years. They should heed the example of Reagan, who used optimism against Carter and the "national malaise"; Franklin Roosevelt, who used it against Hoover and the pessimism induced by the Depression ("the only thing we have to fear is fear itself"); and Clinton (the "Man from Hope"), who used positive language against the senior Bush's lack of vision. This is the linguistic prescription for those who wish to retire Bush in 2004.

Posted by Abe at June 25, 2003 08:18 PM

Comments

You are invited to check some relevant pages in the field of internet pharmacy internet pharmacy http://internet-pharmacy.buy-2005-top.com/ pharmacies pharmacies http://pharmacies.buy-2005-top.com/ brooks pharmacy brooks pharmacy http://brooks-pharmacy.buy-2005-top.com/ on line pharmacy on line pharmacy http://on-line-pharmacy.buy-2005-top.com/ discount pharmacy discount pharmacy http://discount-pharmacy.buy-2005-top.com/ tramadol tramadol http://www.buy-2005-top.com/ generic propecia generic propecia http://generic-propecia.buy-2005-top.com/ - Tons of interesdting stuff!!!

You are invited to check some relevant pages in the field of internet pharmacy internet pharmacy http://internet-pharmacy.buy-2005-top.com/ pharmacies pharmacies http://pharmacies.buy-2005-top.com/ brooks pharmacy brooks pharmacy http://brooks-pharmacy.buy-2005-top.com/ on line pharmacy on line pharmacy http://on-line-pharmacy.buy-2005-top.com/ discount pharmacy discount pharmacy http://discount-pharmacy.buy-2005-top.com/ tramadol tramadol http://www.buy-2005-top.com/ generic propecia generic propecia http://generic-propecia.buy-2005-top.com/ - Tons of interesdting stuff!!!

Please check the sites about... Thanks!!!

Please check the sites about... Thanks!!!

Please check the sites about... Thanks!!!

I agree with you the way you view the issue. I remember Jack London once said everything positive has a negative side; everything negative has positive side. It is also interesting to see different viewpoints & learn useful things in the discussion.I agree with you the way you view the issue. I remember Jack London once said everything positive has a negative side; everything negative has