Comments: Intensive Gene Theory

Comments

Actually, I tried working my way through _Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy_, but there were a lot of things there that I couldn't understand, much less make an intelligent judgement about. However, DeLanda is working mostly with the relevance of Deleuze to physics; this is probably because physics is the most _fundamental_ of the "hard" sciences. But I'd be more interested in a discussion that focused on biology; I'm not convinced that science is necessarily so unified that what works for fundamental physics works for (supposedly less fundamental) biology, since biology has so many additional layers of systems complexity, etc.

I don't have the book in front of me, and I'm due in for a second run through it, but I'll try to comment as best I can.

DeLanda breaks from physics math theory focus sometime in the 2nd (I think) chapter. He address the issue of moving from the physics to other sciences to some extent here as well. The part that seems like it be of most interest to you though is tucked all the way at the end in his discussion of _What is Philosophy?_ where he really gets to the issue of _intensive_ science. What he argues, in what seems like a very short period of time given the title of the book, is that there is that Deleuze's grouping of all science into the realm of the actual and metric is wrong, and that an intensive science also exists, and is in fact more in line with much of Delueze's other work.

Worth looking into, although I must say on first read it came off more as a teaser for another book then as a really satisfying argument. But I suspect there might be more to this to be gleaned on a return read.

Other free penis enlargement guides are easier to commence. Most common are jelqing, dry milking, and PC free penis enlargement guides. There are also free penis enlargement tips especially researched and recommended for beginners.

200 Cash - Cash Advance

fantastic writing, the entry is great!