August 09, 2003
The Technoarchy
Technoarchy: a form of oligarchy where society is controlled by those who use technology the best. Unlike traditional oligarchies technoarchies are generally emergent. For the most part they are not created deliberately, but rise out of the properties of the dominant technology of the time, ie the networked computers of the 21st century.
According to google it was used with a potentially similar meaning once before, in an essay I have yet to get my hands on. If anyone knows of any other prior uses, please let me know. Same goes for other words with a similar meaning.
Expect an essay in the near future.
Posted by William Blaze at August 9, 2003 02:44 PM | TrackBackIt seems like an awkward term to me. "Technocracy" and the related "Technocratic" are more commonly used.
When discussing forms of government, Aristocracy, Democracy, and Oligarchy seem to be the classic terms (If my memory is correct). I think "Technocracy" fits better in the context of these 3 terms.
I also believe there is a positive side to technology - that it doesn't have to automatically turn into a degenerate Technocracy, or be exploited to serve an Oligarchy or Aristocracy.
Technology can be used in the improvement of Democracy - the form I prefer. In many ways, one could argue that technological developments over the ages have undermined Oligarchy and Aristocracy. Democracy is the only form of the 3 that can co-exist with the inventions that keep coming along.
Posted by: Gary Santoro on August 9, 2003 09:07 PM"Technocracy" has long been a term used by the 20th Century occult in tandem with the Illuminati -- see Robert Anton Wilson. Also the surpisingly fascinating alternate-reality "game" Mage makes use of the Technocracy. All of this predates 1997 by about 30 years ..
In another twist, "Technarchy" is the name of a rather infamous track on the "Sounds of Detroit" 7" by Cybersonik (aka Richie Hawtin, John Acquaviva, Dan Bell), Champion 264, released 1990 (original release on +8). The B-Side is "Algorhythm."
Technarchy seems to be a part of cyberpunk discourse .. not surprised if we can track that back to Gibson.
Posted by: tobias c. van Veen on August 10, 2003 01:25 PMFrom the wikipedia
Technocracy: Technocracy is a particular political ideology that advocates far-reaching physical, social and administrative reforms based on scientific analyses of the human environment.
The general term technocracy originated in published critiques of the advocacy group, and now generally refers to an elite who governs through use of technology/technological prowess. The situation usually described is one in which the elite are selected through bureaucratic processes on the basis of specialized knowledge rather than through democratic or other processes. The term may be either positive or negative.
---
now that's a very different animal then what I want to get at with Technoarchy. The "cracy" is all about the state being run by technicians while the "archy" is about emergent power structures. Need to do more research, that damn book is $120 bucks and I have no idea if its relevant.
Gary, of course their is a positive side to technology, but it doesn't "just happen". Their is a lot of blind faith that technology will just make some improved form of governance emerge out of the ether. I just don't buy it. Its half assed theories jacked up on excessive optimism and blind faith in technology. To make tech really improve the world its going to take a lot more then that.
tobias, damn, Bell, Hawtin and Acquaviva together on one track, how often did that happen. Must download. I guess the infamy comes from the "Detroit" part?
Need to research the cyperpunk angle, certainly fits the genre, but I's suspect that if Gibson used it, it would turn up a bit more on Google.
Posted by: Abe on August 10, 2003 05:06 PMAbe,
I never said the positive aspects would be easy.
In addition "Technoarchy" may not be a great choice, because you may effectively describe your idea by using a "degenerate Technocracy". People will know what you are talking about.
You're making a distinction between the state and emergent power structures? The state is often the interface of power structures.
I could be wrong, but you may be going through a lot of effort by pushing a new, unfamiliar word. Perhaps it's more a matter of practical communication (so your ideas may take hold.) Just trying to be constructive. I like your ideas and blog.
Tobias,
Do you have a working XML feed? I received an error when I tried to subscribe to your blog feed.
- Gary
Posted by: Gary on August 10, 2003 06:16 PMOn the new word tip, guess I'm about to find out, right now I'd much rather separate from technocracy completely, rather then modify it.
As for the state vs emergent power structures I think their is a big distinction. The state is not the only power structure out there. Those with power often have a tendency to stratify into a state/law structure, but its not a given and it happens after the emergent stage.
And all criticism is extremely welcome, might not always like it but its for the best. I certainly not right all the time and I'd much rather ideas get pushed and tested to the max then be digested unchallenged.
Posted by: Abe on August 10, 2003 07:21 PMI like the recent comments debunking the 6 degrees theory.
You make a good point that SOME individuals cross borders, but many of us are limited in our spheres. Distance and discrepancy are common.
On power, there can be alternate power structures, but I think there is a historical tendency for emergent power structures to eventually affect the state. Staying completely separate from the affairs of the established government doesn't seem to last long.
Any ideas about the blog feed from Tobias?
Posted by: Gary on August 11, 2003 03:05 AMtobias' feed works fine for me, but that's just to pump it into my sidebar, not in a reader.
http://www.quadrantcrossing.org/blog/rss.xml
Their is plenty of crossover between emergent power structures and the state, but they still aren't the same thing. Take a look at current conflict between anti government, anti tax libertarian business leaders and Bush's government. There is a great article in the NYT magazine this weekend. They effect they state by making sure the state stays out of their spheres of power. Until of course things go bad and then they'd love the state to bail them out...
Posted by: Abe on August 11, 2003 11:20 AMtobias' feed works fine for me, but that's just to pump it into my sidebar, not in a reader.
http://www.quadrantcrossing.org/blog/rss.xml
Their is plenty of crossover between emergent power structures and the state, but they still aren't the same thing. Take a look at current conflict between anti government, anti tax libertarian business leaders and Bush's government. There is a great article in the NYT magazine this weekend. They effect they state by making sure the state stays out of their spheres of power. Until of course things go bad and then they'd love the state to bail them out...
Posted by: Abe on August 11, 2003 11:22 AMExactly...that is the great neurosis of the Bush administration. Trying to dismantle government, yet hungry and salivating for the very power the government office gives them. In a sense, they want it both ways, so they can sit comfortably in the middle.
Looking at history, libertarianism has been around for SO LONG - yet nothing has come of it. In my opinion libertarianism is a theoretical abstraction, an attractive thought, but it fails time after time after time. There's a much higher percentage of libertarians where I live, in Arizona, and yet they still don't gain much traction.
The Tobias feed doesn't work in my reader and his email address didn't work.
Posted by: Gary on August 12, 2003 12:20 AMI look forward to this promised essay. :) If you'd be so kind as to maybe drop me a line when you post it, as I read a LOT of blogs, I'd appreciate it--that way it doesn't get lost in the shuffle.
Posted by: Erica on August 14, 2003 10:28 AMI hope udate http://www.you-date.com this is ok. singles, dating and match love making. find a partner dating and match making is great, authority sites american singles the http://www.american-single-dating.com online internet date following sites where you can meet partners soon to be lovers and match.com get to http://www.match-me-up.com know singles who have the same interests as you. Single, dating and dates all lavalife at the http://www.lavalifedating.com same site. Like going to a group where friendly eharmony and http://www.dating-harmony.com harmony, you date and they date at the same time, online meetings date plus partners http://www.the-date.com cupid really gets going, arrows to the heart cupid junction and what's more http://www.dating-choice.com you can pay on credit with your card using a capital card marbles card and pay online with your computer or laptop - technology is great - check out pc world and http://www.pc-choices.com more of the same can be considered at treadmill exercise and posters thanks.
Posted by: online golf store on May 26, 2004 04:08 AMEnlarge Penis Size Increase Penis Size Naturally Erection Pill For Man Male Enhancement Review
Posted by: Penis Enlargement Pills on February 3, 2005 05:28 PMCheap HGH http://www.hghadvisor.com/anti_aging_hgh.html
Posted by: Bovine Growth Hormone on February 24, 2005 02:44 PMOnline Pharmacy
Posted by: Online Pharmacy on March 15, 2005 12:20 PMhungerlecturequenched
Posted by: hoodlum on May 26, 2005 03:40 AMhungerlecturequenched
Posted by: hoodlum on May 26, 2005 03:40 AMmeetspluckedsmirk
Posted by: unbuttoned on June 2, 2005 06:14 AMmeetspluckedsmirk
Posted by: unbuttoned on June 2, 2005 06:14 AMmeetspluckedsmirk
Posted by: unbuttoned on June 2, 2005 06:15 AMeasierthighsvoices
Posted by: gutteral on June 7, 2005 08:32 AMeasierthighsvoices
Posted by: gutteral on June 7, 2005 08:32 AMeasierthighsvoices
Posted by: gutteral on June 7, 2005 08:33 AMbathroomdiscussedwithdraws
Posted by: excellent on June 13, 2005 12:18 AMbathroomdiscussedwithdraws
Posted by: excellent on June 13, 2005 12:19 AMbathroomdiscussedwithdraws
Posted by: excellent on June 13, 2005 12:19 AMastonishedsportteenagers
Posted by: watches on June 15, 2005 08:54 AMastonishedsportteenagers
Posted by: watches on June 15, 2005 08:54 AMastonishedsportteenagers
Posted by: watches on June 15, 2005 08:55 AMbargainentertaingrey
Posted by: chained on June 19, 2005 09:20 AMbargainentertaingrey
Posted by: chained on June 19, 2005 09:21 AMbargainentertaingrey
Posted by: drive on June 21, 2005 11:43 AMbargainentertaingrey
Posted by: drive on June 21, 2005 11:44 AMmeatoccassionallyworker
Posted by: responses on June 23, 2005 07:54 PMmeatoccassionallyworker
Posted by: responses on June 23, 2005 07:55 PMmeatoccassionallyworker
Posted by: responses on June 23, 2005 07:55 PMarrceilingthird
Posted by: messing on July 2, 2005 12:08 AMarrceilingthird
Posted by: messing on July 2, 2005 12:08 AMarrceilingthird
Posted by: messing on July 2, 2005 12:09 AM